Posts Tagged ‘Federal Reserve’

HB610 Bans Yield Spread Premiums in New Hampshire

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

In the beginning of July, New Hampshire passed HB610, a bill banning yield spread premiums (YSPs) and including more restrictions about cross-selling. The bill goes into effect tomorrow, and, as it does, Generation Mortgage announced to its brokers that it is pulling out of the state.  The bill was passed to help ensure that brokers are not compensated extra for selling borrowers higher interst loans (which is an even larger concern on the forward mortgage side).

However, lenders trying to avoid HB610 and similar legislation may be out of luck– the Federal Reserve is trying to push the mortgage industry to pay originators in the form of a flat fee, though some experts believe that compensation based on interest rate would still be allowed. If the federal legislation goes through, lenders will be hard-pressed to find states that allow YSPs.  Even if the legislation does not pass, the debate and abuse on the forward mortgage side makes similar state legislation more likely.

Obama Administration Considers Proposing a New Mortgage Regulator

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

The Federal Reserve has been under fire for failing to do a better job regulating the mortgage market
The Federal Reserve has been under fire for failing to do a better job regulating the mortgage market

The Wall Street Journal is reporting today that the Obama administration is in advanced level talks to create a new regulatory agency to oversee the mortgage industry, as well as other consumer-oriented financial products. It sounds like mortgages and reverse mortgages would both fall under its discretion.  It appears likely that credit cards will not be included.  The proposed changes come as the Federal Reserve continues to be under criticism for failing to regulate the mortgage market during the housing boom.

However, it seems dubious whether a new agency will really be able to accomplish anything beyond what the government has already been trying to do.  Currently HUD and the FHA have been overseeing the mortgage and reverse mortgage market. These agencies are already under criticism for being too far removed from the market, and the time lapse and red tape in the drafting and interpretation of the McCaskill amendment potentially help signal the validity of these claims.  Adding an additional agency will only further confuse the system and red line the structure.  I question whether it could be more effective as a regulatory body given the landscape in Washington and the organizations that already exist.