|
|
Posts Tagged ‘homeowner’
Friday, November 6th, 2009
 Fannie Mae announced a plan on Thursday that will allow borrowers facing foreclosure to lease their homes. The program, called Deed for Lease or D4L for short, allows borrowers facing foreclosure to hand their deed to the lender in exchange for paying the market rate rent on the home for at least 12 months.
To qualify for the program, borrowers have to have mortgages insured by Fannie Mae, be unable to qualify for President Obama’s mortgage modification program, and be unsuccessful renegotiating with their lenders. While eligible borrowers would have to voluntarily give up the deeds to their homes, they would be able to stay for at least a year, providing that they paid the market rate rent. Rents would then be renewable on a month-to-month basis. Eligible borrowers must document that the new market rate rent is no greater than 31% of their gross income to qualify for Deed for Lease.
The Deed for Lease program is an extremely interesting and valuable way to keep delinquent borrowers in their homes, or merely to allow time for a transition. The program may be especially valuable for families with children, whom they do not want to remove from their schools in the middle of the year. It will help give families more time to come up with options. It will also help underwater homeowners– especially in areas that have seen property values drop significantly.
Furthermore, since tenants of qualifying borrowers are also eligible for the program, Deed for Lease will help tenants whose landlords face foreclosure. As a result, it appears that, though Fannie Mae provided no estimates for how many borrowers will be eligible for the program, Deed Lease looks to be a promising alternative to severely delinquent borrowers with Fannie Mae loans facing foreclosure–and for their tenants.
More information about the program can be found at www.efanniemae.com.
Tags: borrower, borrowers, D4L, Deed for Lease, fannie mae, foreclosure, homeowner, homeowners, landlord, landlords, lease, Mortgage, mortgage modification, mortgages, tenants
Posted in Consumer News, Industry News | No Comments »
Monday, November 2nd, 2009
 Last week a bi-partisan deal was announced in the Senate that will likely pave the way for the new homebuyer’s tax credit to be extended through April 2010. The deal also includes plans for a significant expansion of the tax credit, raising the income requirements to $125,000 per individual and $225,000 per couple from $75,000 per individual and $150,000 per couple. This expansion means that many more individuals will be eligible for the tax credit than were previously. Finally, the deal added a $6,500 tax credit will be available to homeowners wishing to move out of their current home into a more expensive one.
I have been thinking about the deal all weekend, and I worry about its effects. While the goal of the credit is to strengthen the market and help bring home prices back up, increasing income requirements and adding a tax credit to incentivize trading up seems like it risks exacerbating the current problems in the housing market. Many of the current problems in the housing market have been created by homeowners (many first-time homeowners) taking out mortgages that were more than they could afford to pay in order to buy homes. Even when they could afford the mortgage, the recent economic problems have led many to be out of work or find their401(k)s and pensions to be less than they had expected. Consequently, the number of foreclosures and mortgage delinquencies reached all time highs in recent months.
In light of these developments, some proposed that maybe homeownership should no longer be an essential part of the American Dream. It was argued that it is a disservice to put people into homes they cannot afford. While the tax credit is not a very large sum of money, it is enough money to push individuals to act in uncertain times. A realtor in Portland, ME commented that nearly 70% of their clients were motivated by the tax credit. Yes, the housing market could use a boost, but when individuals are making a significant long-term financial decision for a short-term financial incentive, it seems like many poor choices can occur.
Reverse mortgages and refinances are available to help homeowners who find themselves over-extended, but reverse mortgages are only available to those over 62, and refinances and short pays have been extremely hard to get. To avoid another housing crisis, the government does need to stimulate the market, but putting more borrowers into homes they cannot afford does not seem to be a safe way to do so.
Tags: home, home prices, homeowner, homeowners, housing crisis, housing market, money, refinance, reverse mortgage, reverse mortgages, Senate, tax credit
Posted in Consumer News, Industry News | No Comments »
Friday, October 30th, 2009
 The Senate announced a bi-partisan deal yesterday to extend the new homebuyer’s tax credit through April 2010. The deal will extend the $8,000 tax credit, which was set to expire in weeks, on homes with values up to $800,000. While the previous tax credit only applied to homebuyers with salaries of up to $75,000/year for individual and $150,000/couples, the deal raises the requirement, so that the tax credit will now apply to homebuyers with salaries of up to $125,000/year for individuals and $225,000 for couples. This will serve to make the vast majority of homebuyers available for the tax credit. In addition, a new $6,500 tax credit will be available to home owners wishing to move out of their current homes into more expensive ones.
The extension of the tax credit is expected to cost the government $10.2 billion, which will be offset by delaying a tax-break for U.S. based international corporations from 2010 to 2017.
The extension of the tax credit (as well as the new credit for current homeowners) is expected to help the housing market and real estate industry bounce back from the housing crisis. It is hoped that the tax credit, which has been successful in the past year, will help the market return to its former strength in 2010.
Tags: homebuyer, homebuyers, homeowner, homeowners, housing market, new homebuyer's tax credit, real estate, Senate, tax credit
Posted in Consumer News, Industry News | No Comments »
Thursday, September 3rd, 2009
 An article in the Wall Street Journal today focused on a noteworthy new phenomenon: more homeowners are taking in renters. In some cases, homeowners are taking in renters in homes they still live in as a way to help make ends meet. In others, homeowners are becoming landlords, renting out homes they are unable to sell. This seems to be a popular option when the homeowners are forced to make a quick move- especially in the distressed real estate market. While to qualify for a reverse mortgage, a single family residence cannot be a rental property, nor can any portion of it be a rental property, renting out a home may be a good option for those who do not qualify for a reverse mortgage, but need the income from their home. In addition, multi-family homes with separate apartments may be rented and still qualify for a reverse mortgage as long as the homeowner continues to occupy the home.
There are some additional costs that come with being a landlord. Landlord insurance is about 25% higher than homeowners insurance, and landlords who use property manages may wind up paying them 3-12% of the rent. However, a tenant can be a good source of income, helping homeowners be able to continue to afford mortgage payments or break even on a property. When homeowners need to relocate in a short time frame, taking on a tenant helps alleviate the financial burden of paying for two mortgages at once (or a mortgage and rent).
Tags: home, homeowner, homeowners, landlord, landlord insurance, landlords, Mortgage, real estate, rent, renter, renters, reverse mortgage, reverse mortgages, Wall Street Journal
Posted in Consumer News | No Comments »
Thursday, August 6th, 2009
 At the end of June, 24% of homeowners were upside down on their mortgages. In other words, 24% of homeowners owed more on their mortgages then their homes were worth. When added to those with no equity remaining in their homes, the percentage climbs to 32%. Nevada, Arizona, California, and Colorado are the biggest offenders with rates of 40%, 37%, 33%, and 31% respectively of homeowners whose homes are worth less than their mortgages. In some of these markets, homeowners are walking away from homes where they may owe twice as much as the home is worth or more. And when the home is worth less than the mortgage, borrowers no longer qualify for some of the programs that might be able to help them, such as a reverse mortgage.
In response, some are urging the government to begin reducing loan balances to help borrowers cope with the problem. Lowering loan payments or rates will only make the mortgages drag out interminably, and still not recoup the home’s equity (unless it appreciates again over time back to levels that are higher than during the time of the boom). If the government reduces the loan balances, borrowers will be inclined to continue to invest in their homes and stay in their residences, rather than walk away. This will reduce foreclosures, hopefully, as well as abandoned properties.
What do you think?
Tags: Arizona, California, Colorado, foreclosure, foreclosures, government, homeowner, homeowners, loan, loans, Mortgage, mortgages, Nevada, reverse mortgage, reverse mortgages
Posted in Consumer News, Industry News | No Comments »
Wednesday, July 29th, 2009
 Representatives from many of the mortgage industry’s leading mortgage servicing companies met with members of the Obama administration in Washington on Tuesday. The meeting was called to discuss ways to improve the administration’s housing rescue plan and loan modification program. It was called in light of the fact that the program, while launched in February to great fanfare, has only completed trial modifications on over 200,000 loans so far. The administration’s goal remains 500,000 trial mortgage loan modifications by November 1st. In what is perhaps an effort to increase the pressure on mortgage servicers to modify more loans, the Obama administration also announced that it remained on track to release a report on the individual mortgage servicing companies by August 4th. The report will contain the number of trial modifications offered to eligible borrowers and the number of trial modifications currently under way.
Some seem to fear that adding additional pressures to the mortgage servicers will cause banks to take additional losses on the loans. However, it is commendable for the administration to push for the loan modifications–especially in a program that has had so many complaints over the past few months. I’d argue that while the losses taken by the banks will in aggregate certainly be larger than that taken by the homeowner whose loan was not modified and gets foreclosed upon, the significance of the foreclosure is greater for the homeowner than for the bank. Furthermore, it is perhaps easier for the administration to then aid the bank, rather than aid each of the millions of homeowners whose homes have been pushed towards the brink of foreclosure as a result of the economy-the people who this program was designed to help.
Tags: administration, FHA, foreclosure, homeowner, loan, loans, Mortgage, mortgage loan, mortgage loan modification, mortgage loans, mortgage servicer, mortgage servicers, mortgages, Obama administration, Washington
Posted in Consumer News, Industry News | No Comments »
Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009
 While the Obama Administration’s Home Loan Modification Program was supposed to help homeowners who have lost their jobs and are having trouble making their mortgage payments, the NYTimes wrote an article today highlighting the many people whom the banks have been unwilling to help because they have never been late on a mortgage payment before. Some of these homeowners are upside down on their mortgages–others are having trouble simply due to the circumstances of the recession.
Although it is often dangerous to make generalizations solely based on the case highlighted in the story, it is extremely plausible that banks are unsure how to handle customers with good payment histories who are now running into financial difficulties. The banks and government programs seem to be waiting for people to get into a lot of trouble before bailing them out, rather than helping prevent those problems in the first place.
Furthermore, the number of subprime and Alt-A mortgages refinanced in May fell 11 percent from April, according to research by Alan White at the Valparaiso School of Law. Given the record number of homeowners behind on their mortgage payments or facing foreclosure, this statistic is problematic and disturbing.
Many of those affected include seniors. The woman profiled in the article, Eileen Ulery, is 63, old enough to qualify for a reverse mortgage. However, her property is upside down, meaning she would be likely to face a shortfall.
While I agree that on a scale of priorities we should be helping those whose circumstances are most dire first, it does not seem to correlate that homeowners who have been responsible are being penalized. Bank of America Home Loans is quoted in the article as saying they are still putting the programs in place for those not facing a severe threat of foreclosure. I would hope that those programs are as inclusive as possible, and put together soon so that these individuals do not end up in a dire situation before they can get help.
Tags: Alt-A mortgage, bank, Bank of America, bank of america home loans, banks, foreclosure, foreclosures, Home Loan Modification Program, homeowner, homeowners, loan, loan modification, Mortgage, mortgages, New York Times, Obama, reverse mortgage, reverse mortgages, subprime mortgage
Posted in Consumer News, Industry News | No Comments »
Thursday, May 28th, 2009
 In more depressing housing news, the Mortgage Bankers Association announced Thursday that a record 12% of homeowners are behind on their mortgage or in foreclosure. They do not expect the number of foreclosures to crest until the end of next year.
In an interesting twist, the foreclosure rate on prime fixed-rate loans has doubled in the last year. They now comprise the largest share of new foreclosures. The financial crisis has also hit many of those previously thought to be invulnerable: Nearly 6% of fixed-rate mortgages to borrowers with good credit are in the foreclosure process.
The foreclosures also appear to be clustered: 46% are located in California, Florida, Arizona, and Nevada.
We’ve tried to keep much of the blog focused on how to get out of foreclosure for those who are affected by the crisis. Those over the age of 62 can qualify for a reverse mortgage, which can help many avoid foreclosure. There are also many state resources that can assist, such as the one in Illinois discussed here.
If there are any options I’ve left out, please comment with them.
Tags: Arizona, California, financial crisis, Florida, foreclosure, foreclosures, homeowner, homeowners, housing, Mortgage, Mortgage Bankers Association, mortgages, Nevada, prime mortgage, reverse mortgage, reverse mortgages
Posted in Consumer News, Industry News | No Comments »
Wednesday, May 27th, 2009
 A NYTimes graph displaying traditional forward mortgage rates for the NY region Although reverse mortgages require no mortgage payments, many homeowners still have traditional forward mortgages. It is in the context of this traditional market that the following information applies:
The New York Times reported this weekend that 15 year fixed rate mortgages have surged in popularity recently. The number of 15 year fixed rate mortgages increased 56.6% from January to February. While these mortgages may seem attractive, sometimes saving borrowers tens of thousands of dollars in interest payments, lenders counsel that with higher payments, those with 15 year mortgages are more likely to have trouble making payments should they lose their job or encounter another financial emergency. One lender in the article proposed getting a 30 year mortgage and making the payments to pay it off in 15 years, but that way if there were an emergency, the borrower would have a cushion.
I do think that unorthodox thinking appears to be one of the best ways to get through the recession and through nearly any crisis. It is unsurprising that borrowers are looking for low rates (rates on the 15 year fixed rate mortgage are the lowest they’ve been since June 2003). In addition, being able to pay off a mortgage in 15 years is becoming a more and more tempting opportunity for borrowers who don’t want to have to make mortgage payments in retirement–another factor that has made reverse mortgages tempting.
Tags: 15 year, 30 year, borrower, borrowers, fixed rate mortgage, fixed-rate, homeowner, homeowners, Mortgage, mortgages, rate, recession, retirement, reverse mortgage, reverse mortgages
Posted in Consumer News, Industry News | No Comments »
Tuesday, May 26th, 2009
 Zillow’s quarterly Homeowner Confidence Report reveals all-time low levels of confidence in their homes, with 60% of homeowner believing that their homes have lost value in the last 12 months. However, they are still more optimistic than the reality: 80% of homes have lost value in the last year. The 60% level indicates the closest homeowners have come to predicting the reality of the market since the survey began at the beginning of 2008.
On a positive note, 74% of survey participants believed that value of their home would not decline any further, with 27% believing their home values will increase. In the Northeast, the most optimistic region, 77% of survey participants believed that the value of their home would not decrease, while 33% believe it will increase.
Therefore, although homeowners are aware of their declining property values, they seem to believe that the situation will improve. In a real estate market where so much is based on perception, this seems to be a positive sign.
Tags: confidence, homeowner, homes, perception, property value, property values, real estate, real estate market, reverse mortgage, survey, zillow
Posted in Consumer News, Industry News | No Comments »
|
