In a piece in the New York Times today, Edward Glaeser, the famed Harvard economist, made the following comment:

“When housing prices soared, ordinary Americans found it increasingly hard to afford a house. I would certainly cheer if Detroit produced a wonder car for $10,000 that could get 50 miles to the gallon and go from 0 to 60 in five seconds. I would also cheer if the housing industry could produce a beautiful and energy efficient 3,000-square-foot home for $100,000. The same logic pushed me to boo when housing became outrageously expensive. During the boom, I hoped that housing prices would stop rising and even decline.”

Glaeser’s sentiment leads to the following reflection: Isn’t there something appealing about a big beautiful home for $100,000? If housing is a basic right of all Americans (let alone all human beings), then wouldn’t it follow that low housing prices would be a good thing?

Imagine a world in with housing prices were so low that individuals purchasing their homes with cash was commonplace. While mortgages would still exist, they would no longer be necessary for all homebuyers. Perhaps a mortgage would become an option, like the decision purchasers make every day when deciding to make a purchase with cash, credit, or debit. Or, arguably more accurately, like the decision car buyers make when choosing whether to take out a loan or pay with cash.

It is true, as Glaeser pointed out, that low housing prices do have a more dramatic effect on the financial markets than most expected. However, this is only due to the symbiosis that exists between the housing industry, the mortgage industry, and the home goods industry.  So many of the problems in the housing crisis were caused by homes being used as an investment vehicle. When home prices fell, borrowers were stuck with homes that were worth much less than their mortgage payments.  As more and more borrowers lost their jobs in the subsequent Great Recession, even many whose homes still retained equity found themselves unable to afford their mortgages.  And the housing crisis was exacerbated.

The idea of affordable housing for all is a very appealing one.  While it does seem hard to imagine a world in which affordable housing for all could be made a reality and where housing prices could fall so as to make homeownership affordable without crashing the economy, before we spend all our time wishing housing prices would go back up, we should consider solutions (esp. long term) where housing does become more affordable, home ownership more stable, and an individual’s right to housing less susceptible to the whims of the economy.