Posts Tagged ‘NYTimes’

HECM for Purchase Program Featured in NYTimes

Monday, June 29th, 2009
The New York Times featured an article on the HECM for Purchase Program.

The New York Times featured an article on the HECM for Purchase Program.

Friday featured a welcome piece of publicity for the reverse mortgage industry: Bob Tedeschi’s mortgage column in The New York Times was about the HECM for Purchase Program.  Now that the new underwriting procedures for HECM for Purchase loans have been laid out in a recent HUD mortgagee letter, HECM for purchase loans are beginning to close.  However, as the article points out, New York has not been well represented in that mix due to the fact that HECM for Purchases cannot currently be used to purchase a co-op.

The column mentions the high fees associated with the loan. Taxes are higher in NY than in most other states, so that does not help. The column also points out that the HECM for Purchase program is probably not a good idea should one intend to move again within 2-3 years. And, while Tedeschi cited the importance of reverse mortgage counseling, he also pointed out that the quality of counseling can vary, steering prospective borrowers towards those who have past HUD’s certification test.

All in all, though the column could probably be a little clearer, it hopefully will serve as a good step in educating prospective buyers about the HECM for Purchase program.  And, afterall, there is a saying, “There is no such thing as bad publicity.”

A Neighbor's Foreclosure Affects Home Value

Monday, June 15th, 2009

Many prospective reverse mortgage borrowers have questions about appraisals, and while statistics show that consumers’ valuations of their homes are beginning to fall more in line with the reality, there is still generally a gap between what a borrower thinks their home is worth and what an apparaiser thinks it is worth.

The NYTimes wrote an article on Friday highlighting how a neighbor’s foreclosure can dramatically affect home values.  The article cites a report from the Center for Responsible Lending in Durham, NC, stating that about 69.5 million homes will have their home values decline this year due to the foreclosure of a neighbor.  These homes will lose an average of $7,200, leading to a suspected loss of over $500 billion nationwide.  Meanwhile, Credit Suisse projected that about 9 million homes will go into foreclosure from 2009-2011, leading to a ripple effect of declining prices on neighboring homes.

As Bill Tennant pointed out two weeks ago in his blog post on appraisals, one of the leading factors in an appariser’s valuation of a home is the recent sales of comparable homes in the vicinity. As the Center for Responsible Lending’s report shows, many borrowers are likely to take a greater hit due to the foreclosure crisis than they expected on the value of their homes. The Center for Responsible Lending predicted that borrowers will face a drop of 1.3% of their home’s value if they live within 300 ft. of a foreclosed home, and 0.6% of its value if they live between 300 and 500 ft.

Countrywide becomes Bank of America Home Loans

Monday, April 27th, 2009

The Countrywide name will soon be gone for good. The WSJ announced that Bank of America, which recently acquired Countrywide, will discard the Countrywide name. Countrywide will now be rebranded as Bank of America Home Loans.

Bank of America acquired Countrywide, a home mortgage lender, last July for $2.5 billion (the initial $4 billion deal was revalued due to Bank of America’s falling share price by the time it was completed).  Bank of America Home Loans will continue to be based in Calabassas, CA, where Countrywide is based.

Note: I saw an article announcing this information on the nytimes website last night, but it does not appear to be up today.

Conspicuous Spending or Jump Starting the Economy?

Monday, March 9th, 2009
Haute Couture Casual Pants Set for Kids 

Haute Couture for Kids

And now for a change of pace. My hometown paper, the NY Times, just published a great human interest piece on the changing patterns of consumption in America. I really recommend the piece, as some of the anecdotes provide interesting food for thought.

A few examples:

Sasha and Malia wore J.Crew to their father’s Inauguration instead of designer apparel. The Times chalks this up to Obama’s push for fiscal responsibility. While I did not find anything particularly remarkable about the choice to wear J.Crew (which isn’t that cheap), I had trouble thinking of alternatives (Calvin Klein suits?).

Some economists believe that increased consumer spending is the only way to jolt America out of the recession. Of course, this is the opposite of the behavior that is currently being witnessed. Is there something that can be done to spur more spending, or is the change cultural and/or ethical and therefore on a deeper level than policy?

Is consumer spending an ethical issue? At what point is it considered an excess to spend money? I’m curious as to your thoughts.

NY Times: Even Well-off Consumers Aim to Be Less Conspicuous

Until next time.