NAR Raises Concerns About Appraisals and Proposes Expanding Tax Credits

In a report published on Wednesday, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) proposed that Obama’s tax credit for first time buyers should be expanded across the market to all buyers. Concerns were also raised about appraisals.  Lawrence Yun, the NAR’s cheif economist, cited the appraisal problem as “serious,” and characterized by buyers using appraisers who are not from their neighborhood or who are comparing their property to distresed or damaged homes.  These appraisal problems are allegedly pulling down home values, and hurting the industry.

Complaints about appraisals are nothing new. However, the importance of a good appraisal is especially crucial in this economy, where there are so many distressed properties on the market that a home could be compared to. It is nonetheless true that, as we reported, have a foreclosed home within 500 ft. of a property decreases its value significantly.  As the number of foreclosures increase, more properties will be affected. Nonetheless, it is also true that a home that is not in foreclosure should probably not be valued the same as a home in foreclosure.  One is a distressed property, the other is not.

In terms of expanding Obama’s tax credits, the NAR proposes an interesting idea. It is true that an expanded tax credit would probably drive more buyers into the market. However, the influx of buyers would not necessarily cause the market to rebound. We have already seen an increase in home buyers, but property values still remain low and there still remains a lot of properties on the market.  Introducing more potential buyers would likely not change these facts when there are still so many foreclosures dragging down property values in many areas.


 

Obama's Homeowner Relief Program Still Excludes Many

While the Obama Administration’s Home Loan Modification Program was supposed to help homeowners who have lost their jobs and are having trouble making their mortgage payments, the NYTimes wrote an article today highlighting the many people whom the banks have been unwilling to help because they have never been late on a mortgage payment before.  Some of these homeowners are upside down on their mortgages–others are having trouble simply due to the circumstances of the recession. 

Although it is often dangerous to make generalizations solely based on the case highlighted in the story, it is extremely plausible that banks are unsure how to handle customers with good payment histories who are now running into financial difficulties. The banks and government programs seem to be waiting for people to get into a lot of trouble before bailing them out, rather than helping prevent those problems in the first place.  

Furthermore, the number of subprime and Alt-A mortgages refinanced in May fell 11 percent from April, according to research by Alan White at the Valparaiso School of Law. Given the record number of homeowners behind on their mortgage payments or facing foreclosure, this statistic is problematic and disturbing. 

Many of those affected include seniors.  The woman profiled in the article, Eileen Ulery, is 63, old enough to qualify for a reverse mortgage.  However, her property is upside down, meaning she would be likely to face a shortfall.  

While I agree that on a scale of priorities we should be helping those whose circumstances are most dire first, it does not seem to correlate that homeowners who have been responsible are being penalized. Bank of America Home Loans is quoted in the article as saying they are still putting the programs in place for those not facing a severe threat of foreclosure.  I would hope that those programs are as inclusive as possible, and put together soon so that these individuals do not end up in a dire situation before they can get help.


 

Obama Administration Considers Proposing a New Mortgage Regulator

The Federal Reserve has been under fire for failing to do a better job regulating the mortgage market
The Federal Reserve has been under fire for failing to do a better job regulating the mortgage market

The Wall Street Journal is reporting today that the Obama administration is in advanced level talks to create a new regulatory agency to oversee the mortgage industry, as well as other consumer-oriented financial products. It sounds like mortgages and reverse mortgages would both fall under its discretion.  It appears likely that credit cards will not be included.  The proposed changes come as the Federal Reserve continues to be under criticism for failing to regulate the mortgage market during the housing boom.

However, it seems dubious whether a new agency will really be able to accomplish anything beyond what the government has already been trying to do.  Currently HUD and the FHA have been overseeing the mortgage and reverse mortgage market. These agencies are already under criticism for being too far removed from the market, and the time lapse and red tape in the drafting and interpretation of the McCaskill amendment potentially help signal the validity of these claims.  Adding an additional agency will only further confuse the system and red line the structure.  I question whether it could be more effective as a regulatory body given the landscape in Washington and the organizations that already exist.


 

Housing-Rescue Plan to Make Short Sales Easier

 

Obama unveils the first part of his housing rescue plan in February.

Obama unveils the first part of his housing rescue plan in February.

The additions to Obama’s housing plan that were laid out on Thursday are designed to make it easier for homeowners to sell houses that are worth less than their mortgages.  The initiative will help incentivize short sales as well as “deed in lieu” transactions.  These proposals will hopefully help assist borrowers who cannot be helped by a loan modification.

“The government will pay mortgage-servicing companies up to $1,000 and borrowers up to $1,500 for successful short sales or “deeds in lieu” transactions.”(WSJ) The government will also spend up to $1,000 to help get the holders of second mortgages to release their liens so the short sales or “deeds in lieu” transaction can be completed.  In addition, additional payments will be provided to lenders, servicers, and investors in areas where home prices have been dropping to assist with loan modifications.  These funds will hopefully help make investors feel more comfortable modifying loans, rather than being overly concerned that they will face additional losses if the modified loans redefault. 

So far 75% of loans are currently being covered by the plan, including those by Bank of America, Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo.  Other companies are evaluating whether they wish to participate.

Given that short sales have accounted for 15-20% of existing home sales this year according to the National Association of  Realtors, this new program should provide benefits to investors, lenders, servicers and borrowers looking to sell homes or find other ways out of underwater mortgages and tough financial situations.  Hopefully it will help make short sales easier to complete and make foreclosure easier to avoid.  

If the popularity of the loan modification plan unveiled by the administration nearly three months ago is any indication, this program should be a huge success.

The plan also has positive ramifications for the reverse mortgage industry due to the new HECM for Purchase program. Negotiating a short sale is often part of the process of a reverse mortgage when the borrower is trying to avoid a foreclosure or underwater on their previous mortgage.  Hopefully, this plan will make reverse mortgages that fall into this category easier to obtain as well.