Posts Tagged ‘premiums’

Congress Expresses Concerns About Long Term Care Insurance

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

When members of the reverse mortgage industry talk about cross-selling and when prospective borrowers approach a reverse mortgage, they often talk about “long term care insurance.”  Long term care insurance is a product that is completely separate from a reverse mortgage in which borrowers pay premiums in order to hopefully receive coverage/reimbursement to pay for long term care, should they need it. Long term care would include things like a stay in a nursing home or an attendant to help a senior bathe and dress.  It appears extremely difficult to find information on the exact way these programs work in an objective manner online.  From all the chatter it should come as no surprise that at a Senate hearing today lawmakers and watchdog groups cautioned that more consumer protections are needed.

Some of the concerns about long term care policies include that there is no guarantee that a policy purchased today (or 10 years ago) will still meet the needs of the client in 20 or 30 years (people are often advised to buy long term care insurance when they are still in mid-life, before they need it). Since some private long term care insurers are partnering with Medicaid, consumer protections become more dire because at least 30 states will soon have programs to encourage middle-income residents to acquire long term care.  Among the desired protections are ensuring that the premiums do not increase too dramatically, that complaints are addressed in a timely fashion, and that insurance agents are trained.  Consumers are urged to educate themselves about the fee increases in their policy, the events that will activate it, and how they will be protected against inflation.

Finally, as is true with reverse mortgages, many other products can prove to be viable options for those exploring long term care insurance, including mutual funds, investments, and, in some cases, even reverse mortgages.

HUD Considers Raising Insurance Premiums on Reverse Mortgages

Friday, June 12th, 2009
HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan

HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan

HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan said in a Congressional hearing on Thursday that the Government could raise insurance premiums to avoid the nearly 800 million dollar influx of taxpayer money necessary to offset all the FHA losses given the current housing market, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.  It would be the first time taxpayer dollars have gone into the reverse mortgage program in its 20-year history.  Donovan argued against raising the premiums, on the grounds that increased premiums or heightened restrictions could lower participation in the program.

Secretary Donovan’s fear of increasing fees and lowering participation ought to be heeded by Congress. The reverse mortgage program is a program that can help a lot of individuals remain in their home and avoid foreclosure, as we have already seen.  By adding more roadblocks, limitations, and/or costs, the government risks making the program inaccessible to the very people they wish to help the most.