HUD Considers Raising Insurance Premiums on Reverse Mortgages

HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan

HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan said in a Congressional hearing on Thursday that the Government could raise insurance premiums to avoid the nearly 800 million dollar influx of taxpayer money necessary to offset all the FHA losses given the current housing market, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday. It would be the first time taxpayer dollars have gone into the reverse mortgage program in its 20-year history. Donovan argued against raising the premiums, on the grounds that increased premiums or heightened restrictions could lower participation in the program.

Secretary Donovan’s fear of increasing fees and lowering participation ought to be heeded by Congress. The reverse mortgage program is a program that can help a lot of individuals remain in their home and avoid foreclosure, as we have already seen. By adding more roadblocks, limitations, and/or costs, the government risks making the program inaccessible to the very people they wish to help the most.

WSJ Features Front Page Story on Reverse Mortgages

The reverse mortgage industry received a pleasant surprise this morning when the Wall Street Journal wrote a big feature on reverse mortgages on the front page of the personal journal section. While much of the article explains what reverse mortgages are and how they work, an interesting piece for lenders is the section on how much money the FHA has lost through reverse mortgages. HUD asked for $800 million taxpayer dollars to boost its loan-loss reserves as housing prices continue to decline. Jeff Lewis, the chairman of Generation Mortgage, mentioned that about 1/3 of the borrowers who might have closed reverse mortgages two years ago would no longer qualify today due to the declining home values. Perhaps in connection with this, the article mentions how sudden pricing changes by Fannie Mae have recently disrupted some reverse mortgage transactions, as borrowers realize they will qualify for less money at closing than they did when they began the application process, sometimes even having a shortfall.

The stresses on the industry are noteworthy, especially as interest in HECMs increases. The number of reverse mortgages being closed has proliferated in recent months, yet housing values do continue to decline. Hopefully these financial considerations will not too greatly imperil the government programs.

Housing Market Declining and Improving At the Same Time?

The construction industry is not doing well, but does that mean the market is down?

Alright, it’s 10am CST. I have already read five conflicting headlines with respect to the housing market today:

1. ”Housing Starts Hurt by Steep Drop in Apartment Building” – NYTimes

2. “Sales Drop 10%, But Home Depot Tops Forecasts” – NYTimes

3. “Builder Sentiment High on Affordability” – HousingWire.com

4. “Housing Starts Declined in April” – Wall Street Journal

5. “Signs of Optimism — Home Prices Rise” – Union-Tribune

So which is it?

These headlines, all from reputed publications, perhaps indicate the extent to which the market is saturated with housing news, as well as the vast amount of confusion in regards to which the direction the housing market is actually heading in. While it would certainly be easy to write about any one of these pieces, doing so would only steer your opinion in whatever direction the story I discussed took.

The data can be used to defend any viewpoint: Home Depot is doing well, Lowes is doing poorly. Housing starts for apartment buildings are on the decline. Housing starts for single family homes are stable. Housing prices are rising in some areas. The market still has not rebounded in others. The question is, which indicator do you deem to be the most important?

Or should we simply be acknowledging that it is too early to predict the rise or fall of the housing market with any certainty?

States Hold Banks Accountable for Foreclosed Properties

The Wall Street Journal published a fun piece this morning about how a number of towns in CA, Indio, CA in particular, have made it a criminal misdemeanor for lenders not to keep up with foreclosed properties. The law goes after banks that have allowed properties to fall into disrepair, with concerns such as high weeds, algae in pools, and dead grass. Apparently, it has generally been effective. After at first only writing checks to pay the fines, it seems that lenders such as Countrywide, Washington Mutual, and Fannie Mae are coming into compliance.

Reverse mortgages are often a great way to potentially keep people in their homes and help avoid foreclosure, but when foreclosure is unavoidable, it is nice to see a community holding the lenders responsible for picking up the pieces.

At the same time, the Associated Press released an article on the increasingly high number of vacant homes in the Midwest, where vacancy rates in some areas are over 40% empty. Brian Bernardoni, Policy Director for Chicago’s Board of Realtors, was quoted today in the Associated Press as saying that vacant homes hurt a neighborhood’s “curb appeal,” making it that much harder for the neighborhood to recover. However, if lenders take care of vacant and foreclosed homes, preventing them from becoming refuges for squatters and keeping up the outer appearance of the buildings, the neighborhood may not suffer as much damage–in both the short and the long run.

Countrywide becomes Bank of America Home Loans

The Countrywide name will soon be gone for good. The WSJ announced that Bank of America, which recently acquired Countrywide, will discard the Countrywide name. Countrywide will now be rebranded as Bank of America Home Loans.

Bank of America acquired Countrywide, a home mortgage lender, last July for $2.5 billion (the initial $4 billion deal was revalued due to Bank of America’s falling share price by the time it was completed). Bank of America Home Loans will continue to be based in Calabassas, CA, where Countrywide is based.

Note: I saw an article announcing this information on the nytimes website last night, but it does not appear to be up today.

Housing Sales Improve 5.1%

The housing market is on the rise

Although the housing market has been down, it looks like it may be starting to rebound. The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that housing sales rose 5.1% in February. A similar article a few days earlier reported that sales in California, one of the states hit hardest by the housing crisis, have also improved. According to the California Association of Realtors, homes in California were on the market an average of 6.7 months in January 2009, compared with 16.6 months a year earlier.

While many of the homes that have been spurring the increase in sales nationwide were foreclosed homes, the rejuvinated market should be seen as a positive sign. Mortgage rates (both for mortgages and reverse mortgages) remain low. HECMs are now available to help seniors purchase homes. The increase in home sales are signs that these changes may be working. Although the new HECM for purchase program was not put into effect until after the CA data was collected, it is a positive sign that the market appears ready to support such a program.

While it’s too soon to say the market is on an upswing for good, the rejuvenated market is definitely a step in the right direction and a good sign for lenders, realtors, homeowners, and prospective homeowners alike.