A new concept for senior housing was profiled in the New York Times today. The article focused on Fox Hill, a new senior housing complex outside Bethesda, MD. Rather than only allowing seniors to rent rooms on a monthly payment or requiring them to pay a high entrance fee which is partially refunded when they either pass away or move out, Fox Hill allows seniors to own their homes. Yet they still receive many of the same benefits that come with living in a senior home, including communal meals, social activities, and access to health care. In home care is available at an additional fee, and assisted-living units are also within the same building, enabling couples to live close to one another while one requires more assistance.
Fox Hill, developed by Sunrise Senior Living, has had trouble filling all the condos. However, the concept seems interesting, especially because it appears that, assuming the condos are FHA approved, the HECM for Purchase program might enable borrowers to use a reverse mortgage to purchase their condos. The article also surmises that the number of seniors in all types of housing has slipped nearly 2 percentage points thus far this year, as seniors struggle to sell their homes. It wonders whether the concept will gain more traction once the market rebounds.
The concept seems valuable, especially when one considers the large numbers of seniors congregating in locations such as South Florida and Phoenix. There is something to be said for being a part of a community of one’s peers, and many seniors in those areas also own their homes. While the properties in Fox Hill are expensive, ranging from around $500,000 to just over $1 million, there are seniors who are willing to pay that much for a new home. And while, as the article notes, some seniors do not care whether or not they own their home, others note that they like that they are accumulating equity.